Movie Review: Titanic (1997)
Directed by James Cameron, Titanic was the highest grossing movie ever until Avatar dethroned it only recently. This is a movie that everyone loves to hate now but I remember back in 1997 when everyone saw it in theater, sometime multiple times, it was a goddamn smashing success. I eventually went to see it weeks after the open (I was not a movie buff back then lol) and as an impressionable kid, I was pretty blown away too.
The movie starts in a modern day setting as researchers are exploring the wreck of the Titanic for long lost treasures. All they find, after discovering a safe, is a hand-drawn picture of a nude woman with a massive diamond necklace around her neck. They are stunned when that same woman, now 101 years old, calls them, wishing to get on board of their ship. The flashback begins as she tells the story of what happened on those fateful days leading up to the tragedy. Rose DeWitt Bukater (Kate Winslet) is a young upper-class woman. Although she and her mother appear wealthy, they are burdened by debt and she is being forced to marry “Cal” Hockey (Billy Zane), the arrogant and controlling son of a steel tycoon, to erase her family’s debt. Depressed and distraught, she attempts to jump off the ship but a young man prevents her from doing so. The man is Jack Dawson (Leonardo DiCaprio), a free-spirited artist without a penny. The two soon become friends and then lovers… There you have it, a star-crossed love story that “transcends” social and economic classes and is set within the backdrop of the sinking of the Titanic.
Titanic was at the time the most expensive movie ever made with a budget of $200 million. The best aspect of the movie is all the details that went with recreating the ship and its sinking on screen. From the costumes to the furniture and silverware, Cameron really succeeded in immersing the viewer and making him/her part of the movie. The movie is visually spectacular from beginning to end. The disaster part of the movie is simply fantastic and you really live the tragedy through each of the characters. What would one do in such a large scale catastrophe? Cameron does a great job of keeping most of the focus on the two main characters. We never stop caring for them even in the midst of the disaster.
Unfortunately, this movie was extremely ambitious and not everything worked out as well as others. Structurally, the entire modern day subplot should simply have been edited out, easily saving 30 minutes of screen time. Thinking back, it brought absolutely nothing to the movie and for a movie to be well over 3 hours, every single scene must be in the movie for a really good reason. Additionally, it removed the suspense of knowing whether Rose would survive the disaster.
The script written by Cameron himself, albeit effective, is just overly simplistic, unoriginal and full of cliches. Every characters that comes on screen are stereotypical caricatures. The wealthy are all greedy and haughty, despising the poor and being selfish because of their social status. The poor are all essentially good-natured, noble and compassionate. Basically, everything is black and white with no shades of gray, dumbed down and manipulated so the viewer has absolutely nothing to reflect about.
The love story between Jack and Rose is a merely average romance. The two actors have very good chemistry together and we don’t have to wonder why Rose would fall in love with Jack. However, some of the dialogues they have felt extremely contrived and flat. The two characters simply don’t seem to have much to talk about (a scene about learning to spit???) and all the blame goes directly to Cameron’s lazy writing. It also doesn’t help that Cal, played by Billy Zane is a completely one-dimensional archetype: he is the most arrogant, snobbish and evil fiance on Earth and there is absolutely no redeeming quality about him. Imagine if Cal was actually a decent guy who might have taken Rose for granted but then realizes he is losing her, and corrects himself. As far as romantic tension goes, even though we all know who Rose is ultimately going to choose, it would have made the movie so much more enthralling not being sure what she was going to do. Those are the two main aspects about the romance that hamper the movie most.
But then, why did this movie rack up so much money? Why all the love? Why eleven Academy Awards? Titanic is by no means a bad movie. Despite all its limitations, the movie does everything it needs to do effectively. An unoriginal but solid emotional core, two charismatic leads, universal themes, stunningly beautiful visuals, a great soundtrack, and a massive disaster that has fascinated the world since 1912. Cameron is more a great manipulator than a great director. He understands exactly what the masses want to see in their movies and he simply delivers time and time again. Jack represents the little guy, freedom, passion, purity of spirit and everyone pulls for him to get Rose, who seem to be his perfect match. Cal represents everything that could be wrong with a man. Greedy, morally corrupted, overbearing, jealous, he obviously has no redeeming quality which makes him the clear cut antagonist. Rose chooses freedom over slavery, Jack sacrifices his life so his beloved one lives. The masses yearned for a movie like this and Cameron delivered it.
Production values are all first-rate as you would expect from a big budget movie. The CGI effects are still fairly satisfactory more than a decade after. The photography is grandiose and breathtaking, while the musical score by James Horner is haunting and still one of the most recognizable to this day.
A well-executed melodrama set in the grandiose backdrop of one of the greatest tragedy in history, Titanic is a timeless epic despite a relatively average and unoriginal central romance that feels flat and contrived.
B
Notes: Rated PG-13 for disaster related peril and violence, nudity, sensuality and brief language. 194 minutes











11 Comments
I still unashamedly love this movie. I saw it eight times when it came out and even now I’m hypnotized by each of its corny minutes. What Cameron did back then is almost magical given how cynical the 90′s were. He made us all watch and love a movie that by current standards would be frowned upon and sent to chick flick hell.
You know I actually like this movie a lot back when it’s first released. Sure the love story is full of cliches but it still moved me to tears, probably due to Kate Winslet’s performance. I too was in awe watching the whole boat-sinking scene, I kept wondering ‘how’d they do that?!” much like the way I watched AVATAR now. I agree with Jose, it’s a feat in itself that this movie has ‘weight’ beyond the typical, banal romance story… and therefore elevates it above a ‘chick flick.’
What I found compelling about Titanic was how interesting a story that we all knew how ended turned out. The tension, the characters, and the tragedy, the ship itself was even a character. I’m a big fan of this movie and recently re-watched it and found it just as enjoyable. Perhaps it’s not the greatest film ever made, but it’s a damn good movie worth positive attention instead of the negative connotations attached to it nowadays.
The movie was actually on TBS last night and this reminded me how incredibly haunting the soundtrack by James Horner really was. It really was a masterpiece that elevated the entire movie from beginning to end.
@ Heather: I definitely agree that all the negative stuff thrown at the movie simply because it was so popular is complete BS. Those were probably the same people who went to see it multiple times back in 1997.
What do you make of this?
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/james-cameron-wasnt-kidding-about-titanic-3d.php
I don’t really mind all that much especially if they are going to make Terminator II in 3D!!! I know I wouldn’t pay to go see Titanic in 3D, it’s still the same story that we have all seen many times. The 3D craze should die down once the novelty factor is gone
“I don’t really mind all that much especially if they are going to make Terminator II in 3D!!!”
From your mouth to James Cameron’s ears, lol. Arnie in 3D. Now that would be something to behold, indeed!
But then again, ‘T2′ didn’t earn nearly as much as Titanic, and it’s all about the money after all.
Kate Winslet’s character was such a pig in this movie. Honestly, you aren’t going to let Leo get on the big glass door at all? Here, let’s awkwardly talk while you DIE!
If I remember right, he actually tries to get on it too, but the thing almost capsizes so he shows some chivalry
@Marshall and the Movies, I totally agree. I mean, during the movie that’s like EXACTLY what I was thinking!! They should have at least taken turns… Or if Rose had actually GOTTEN on the boat, Jack could’ve used the glass door thingy and both of them would have survived. I would love this movie much more with a happy ending. :’(
Really Marshall and Anon? If your loved one was in dire peril, you would actually “take turns”? That’s the whole point of the movie that Leo sacrifices so Rose can live.
Trackbacks