Reeves’ “Let Me In” A Chilling Remake

With Let Me In, Matt Reeves, the director of the under appreciated Cloverfield (2007), has created a superb re-adaptation of John Ajvide Lindqist’s novel, and respectfully acknowledges and certainly does justice to Thomas Alfredson’s outstanding Swedish language original adaptation, Let the Right One In (2008). With the exception of the change of location, now set in New Mexico, the alteration and elimination of a few minor plots points, and some effective stylistic twists, Let Me In serves as an almost shot-for-shot re-imagining of Alfredson’s film. Like its predecessor, it stands as one of the definitive genre films of the last decade and it’s one of last years best releases. As unnerving and emotionally gripping as the original and certainly as powerful, Let Me In is sure to impress both lovers of the original and those new to the story.

The central character of Let Me In is Owen (Kodi Smit-McPhee, The Road), an unhappy and lonely 12-year-old misfit who finds himself the victim of some serious bullying from his classmates at school, and comes home to a broken home with his parents divorced and his father living away. He fantasizes about fighting back against his tormentors, but lacks the courage. He even buys a knife and pretends that a tree in the courtyard is a bully and he aggressively stabs at it. He is kept under strict supervision from his workaholic mother, and finds solace each evening out in the courtyard at the centre of his apartment block. The film introduces a Rear Window-like surveillance sequence as he spends one night swiveling his telescope around the surrounding apartments spying on his neighbours. It is this night that he spots the new arrival of a young girl and her father/guardian, who move in next door. We soon discover that this girl is named Abby (Chloe Moretz, Kick Ass), a pretty but peculiar girl who wanders through the snow covered courtyard barefoot, and possesses incredible puzzle solving skills when she completes Owen’s Rubik’s Cube. The pair, both independent social misfits, seem to immediately bond and find comfort confiding in one another. But Abby has a sinister secret; she requires blood to survive. Her guardian (played by Richard Jenkins) begins targeting some of the young people in the town, and draining them of their blood to feed to Abby. In one of the film’s many chilling sequences, he hides in the back seat of the car of one of the school’s young graduates, and breaks his neck. He ties him upside down and then drains blood from his carotid artery into a bottle. The next day, the young boy is discovered murdered, and the local Police Chief (Elias Koteas) takes up the case.

After the body of another man is found frozen in the ice and following an attack by Abby on one of Owen’s neighbors, Abby finds herself the subject of the investigation. The eternal bond between the two becomes so apparent in the films’ gripping final sequences. Owen is exposed to such violence, both as a witness and as a victim, and his vulnerability is exposed to a terrifying extreme. All of his childhood innocence is lost, while Abby’s love for Owen is clearly proven. Like Alfredson’s film, the bloodiest sequence is left until the end, and it’s a formidable opponent to the original, but I did prefer Alfredson’s. Whether you interpret Let Me In as a horror film, as a serial killer thriller, or as a coming-of-age romance, it is a memorable experience. While I loved Alfredson’s film and still consider it superior, and while I am genuinely disappointed at Western audiences’ aversion to subtitles that resulted in the idea of this remake, this was a very accomplished horror film and I walked out of the cinema thinking I had seen few that had resonated so strongly with me in a long time.

Both of the leads are fantastic, and they incredibly mimic the mannerisms of their previous performers from Let the Right One In, but also add their own personal touches to their characters. They are both warmly adorable and have great chemistry and their bond is completely convincing. But Smit-McPhee is a revelation here, having already garnered recognition and praise alongside Eric Bana in Romulus, My Father and Viggo Mortensen in The Road. While Moretz, who shocked audiences with her role as Hit Girl in the earlier 2010 release, Kick Ass, proves her maturity with this excellent performance.

Let Me In is marvelously shot, brilliantly capturing the atmosphere of the original but actually furthering the film’s intensity. The changes made by Reeves also work well, most notably the decision to have Richard Jenkins follow his targeted victims by hiding in the back of their cars, and moving the hospital scene to the very beginning, allowing Reeves to introduce Elias Koteas’ detective character and to use him throughout the entire film. There are some genuinely scary moments, and the car crash sequence is particularly outstanding. It is also quite bloody and grotesquely brutal and we see more of Abby’s transformed state in Reeves’ film. The visual effects used to intensify Abby’s attacks on her victims are somewhat unnecessary though. Michael Giacchino’s pulsing score, which I found to be a bit irritating to begin with, was an excellent accompaniment throughout. Reeves has tried to replicate the original and has well and truly succeeded. While it would have been great to see Reeves adapt the novel from an even fresher angle, his film is a great film because Alfredson’s is.

B+

(8.5/10)

Notes: Rated R for strong bloody horror violence, language and a brief sexual situation.

How do you compare Let Me In to the Swedish original? Do you prefer it? Based on the success and quality of this Swedish to American re-make, how confident are you of Fincher turning out a great adaptation of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo?

TAGS: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

15 Comments

  1. Julian says:

    I saw both…and i still find the original better.

  2. Sam says:

    Nice review Andrew, never bother to see this … then again it was before I watched pretty much everything that hits multiplexes.

    How come more people don’t comment on your reviews, odd?

    • You really should check it out Sam. It is a genuinely chilling horror film that benefits from a great story, and quality child performances. Ahh, I get comments, i guess. Haha

  3. Sebastian says:

    BEST FILM OF LAST YEAR, HANDS DOWN!!!!

    I saw this one before LET THE RIGHT ONE IN, and I honestly prefer this one. I thought the kids were better, especially Moretz, who blew my socks off. Reeve’s decision to focus only on the kids and not take time for the drinking buddies was the right one.

    • Yeah I agree. It was near my Top 10. Really enjoyed it, but I think I still prefer the original. I thought the inclusion of Elias Koteas was great because it introduced an authority figure to investigate the strange events, rather than the local townsfolk (drinking buddies), and I think there was a stronger tension to Let Me In.

  4. I actually saw Let Me In before watching Let The Right One In. I actually prefer Let Me In still more. The connection that they had and the attention to background detail just really did it for me and gives hope for some “non-ruins” of foreign flicks….like Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. I thought director Matt Reeves did an excellent job.

    Nice review

    • I thought he did a great job also, especially taking on this after Cloverfield. Very different films. I am pretty confident about Fincher making a great film out of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. It will certainly be better than Fire and Hornets Nest, which I did not like at all. Very unsatisfying. I really thought the chemistry between the children was fantastic in both films, which is essential to our emotional relationship to them. Thanks for the comment!

  5. Greg Cwik says:

    I think in a lot of ways Let Me In is the superior film because of the additions to the father character (and Richard Jenkins is nothing of excellent in everything he does) and I appreciate the more insidious sense of atmosphere that Reeves brings to the remake. HOWEVER, I feel that the pool ending, on which much of the film’s romanticism rests, was far better in the original; truly one of the great scenes from the last decade. And the young girl in the original was perfect. Chloe Moretz is a talented young actress but Lina Leandersson’s performance was a defining moment of the last decade in film, and that’s one of the remake’s drawbacks.

    • I really think that the pool scene in the original was better also. I liked Chloe Moretz’ performance but I think Let Me In belonged to Kodi Smit-McPhee. He was fantastic!

  6. amy says:

    I gotta go with Julian here… but then again, I’m not a regular fan of horror, so what I found to be highlights in the the original, where the parts they got rid of in this. I liked all the silences, and how innocent Eli and Oskar were, and though I appreciate Moretz, and the script’s attemt, at trying to play Ali (?) like a predator trying to find another eh… “handler,” it just didn’t hold the same for me.

    Let Me In for me was loud, with explosions and flashbacks, in things where it didn’t need it, while you had a whole aspect of the book that wasn’t explored. As it is, Let Me In is just trying to make the Swedish film forcefully “exciting”.

  7. Fitz says:

    Let Me In was more enjoyable. The leads were more capable actors, Abby’s moral complexity is more developed in the remake, and Owen is just generally misguided, not a psychopath like in the original.

    • amy says:

      yeah, but Oskar wasn’t merely misguided in the book. The similarities in violent behavior between Oskar and Eli’s survival instinct was what made the film/book special to me. Leaving me with that line by Eli of “Be me a little”. Like I said, I understand and appreciate what they wanted to make with the film, but by doing these tiny changes, it made something that was contemplative and ambiguous into something direct and blunt.

    • amy says:

      but then again… I’m really REALLY biased towards the Swedish version because I listed it on my #1 of 2008. xD

      • Greg Cwik says:

        Yes, I’d say it’s fairly clear you prefer the original. But Let Me In feels less pretentious at times and the camera work is still great, I don’t know how it came form the same guy who did Cloverfield. I was a huge supporter of the original before the remake went into the works (yeah yeah hipster blah blah) but I couldn’t be happier with the remake. It’s just as intimate and much scarier. Calling it “loud” or whatever ignores how Reeves show us the unfortunately violent and utterly lonely life that Eli leads. Let the Right One In is undoubtedly beautiful but it’s certainly flawed. All this being said, I still favor many aspects of the original but find the remake more accessible. We should all be glad they treated the genre so respectfully.

  8. Kruun says:

    I liked the changes they made in the story, but the original had a better atmosphere. I still prefer Let the right one in.

Leave a Comment


Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Trackbacks