The Classic Corner: “Chinatown”
Many say that the 1970s were the last “great” decade of film. They may be on to something. Ranking among the best of those pictures would have to be 1974’s Chinatown, Roman Polanski’s moving, engaging and beautiful film noir that showcases Jack Nicholson at perhaps the pinnacle of his career.
Crime dramas often have a tendency to go on autopilot or settle for plot clichés. With Chinatown, though, Polanski — who made the film before he was charged with sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl and fled the United States in 1977— reinvents the wheel with a thought-provoking story and delivers a masterpiece never to be forgotten.
Set in 1930s Los Angeles, Chinatown follows Jake Gittes (Nicholson), a private detective who specializes in matrimonial cases. As the film opens, Jake is hired by Evelyn Mulwray (so we think), a woman who suspects her husband Hollis is having an affair. He also happens to be the chief engineer of the powerful Los Angeles Department of Power and Water and the simple case of marital infidelity soon plunges Jake into a tidal wave of lies, murder and deception.
Written by Robert Towne, the plot, at first, appears impossible to solve. So many plot lines, characters with short screen time and dialogue consistently reverting back to Chinatown make Polanski’s film challenging, but never overwhelming.
Perhaps that reason alone is what makes Chinatown so special. We don’t get bogged down by the plot details we’re given, we simply embrace them. Great films feature an engrossing story that instantly grabs our attention and makes us care about the characters. When those great films conclude we are in awe of we’ve just witnessed. Chinatown does all of the above.
For those who did not grow up with Jack Nicholson (I did not), Chinatown is a good start to explore his body of work. My initial perception of Jack is the guy yelling on the sidelines of every home Lakers game or the devilish, sadistic character he played so well in Martin Scorsese’s The Departed.
Seeing the young Nicholson in Chinatown is revelatory. He’s the core, the emotional spine of the picture. We sense Jake’s hidden, though oh-so evident, pain throughout the film. What makes Nicholson performance great is that he plays Jake with sincerity, a trait that is not in fashion with modern-day actors. Today’s protagonists, predominately of the male gender, are stiff, lacking emotion and conviction.
In contrast, Nicholson’s Jake is a real character – he’s cynical, has an ego and most importantly has genuine feelings. We know this because Nicholson plays the character straight with nuance and life. Time and time again we hear talk about Chinatown, a place where everything goes and much is unsaid or never explained. We never quite understand Jake’s past or his feelings for others, we just know he has them.
Faye Dunaway, whose acclaimed work ranges from Bonnie and Clyde to Network, gives a brilliant performance too. Her character is a conundrum. Her performance is a joy to watch. And the late John Huston, who directed multiple acclaimed films such as The Maltese Falcon and Treasures of Sierra Madre, is creepy and enigmatic as Noah Cross. As good as Huston and Dunaway are, though, they still come second hand to Nicholson’s stroke of brilliance as Gittes.
The film looks great too. Cinematographer John A. Alonzo does a seamless job with the look of the film. He captures the spirit of L.A. and the dark, mysterious undertones that lies within Chinatown. And Jerry Goldsmith’s score is beautiful and memorable as it adds mystery and tenderness to every scene.
Simply put Chinatown is a tour de force: masterful acting, breathtaking cinematography, and an engrossing plot that leaves you in awe. Sure, the film’s central mystery will likely never be solved, but sometimes, just sometimes, imagining the multiple outcomes is far more fulfilling.
And oh how in awe I was.
A
✭✭✭✭/✭✭✭✭
You can follow me on twitter @DukeSensation














10 Comments
Just about perfect crime-mystery film from the ever so tense hands of Roman Polanski. I had no idea what was going to happen next, and that last quote will stay in your mind forever. Good Review!
You’re right on about the last line – it stays with you.
No arguments here. I love so many things about Chinatown, and it still remains with me though it’s been a while since I’ve seen it. It’s also great to see Polanski make Jake a good investigator but not a great one. Each discovery he makes leads to more questions, and the end result may futile regardless of what he learns. Everyone in this movie (Nicholson, Dunaway, etc.) is at the height of their power. This is an excellent choice to present to someone who looks down upon “older movies”.
That’s true – “Chinatown” would be a great film to show to people who don’t like seeing older pictures – it’s entertaining and captivating.
I thought Huston was creepy, though mesmerizing in every scene.
Thanks for reading!
Great piece on a great film.
Easily one of the best films ever made. The best film noirs (and this is definitely a neo-noir) are those with overly-convoluted plots, like The Big Sleep or Out of the Past or (of course) Chinatown.
I love the 1970′s as a cinematic age. From around 1967 (when the production code finally totally broke down) until the age of the blockbusters came into full force in the early 1980′s, the director was the king of Hollywood. Many getting final cut (a thing that is almost non-existent in today’s corporate powermad Hollywood) and therefore making the films they want, not what the studio wants. So many great American films came out of this era and Chinatown is one of the best.
Then there is Jack. These days, for the most part, he seems like a joke, but in his hey day (Carnal Knowledge, Last Detail, Five Easy Pieces, Goin’ South, Cuckoo’s Nest, Chinatown, The Passenger, The King of Marvin Gardens, The Missouri Breaks) he was in top form and one of the most daring, fun-to-watch actors working in the biz.
He still does some good stuff from time to time – ie : “The Departed”, “As Good As It Gets” and “Something’s Gotta Give”.
Thanks for reading.
If I may be so hyperbolic, I consider this film to be the embodiment of the moving image. The shots in the film advance the story without ever having to show off and the story makes a definitive comment on the Bigger Picture without, you know, “commenting” on it. Nice review.
You’re right on with the advancement of the story by the shots incorporated here.
I first saw this as a college sophomore in 1996. I thought it was great at the time and it sort of set me off on a Nicholson binge. But it took a recent re-watch (3 months ago) to drive home just how genius the whole film really is. It’s a crowning achievement of American cinema.
There seems to be a lot of readers talking about the 70′s in American cinema lately. If any of you are interested, I highly recommend this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Riders-Raging-Bulls-Sex-Drugs-Rock/dp/0684857081
This is one of the all time greats. Every time I watch it, I’m amazed at how detailed and complex it is, but also how easy it is to watch. One of the great American movies and one of the greatest directors of all time at the top of his game.
Trackbacks