DVD Review: ‘Paranormal Activity 3′ Review: It’s Scary… How Mediocre This Film Is
Since 2009, the Paranormal Activity series has eclipsed the Saw franchise in topping both the domestic and worldwide box office gross during the weeks leading up to and proceeding the Halloween weekend. A combined worldwide gross of just over $370 million dollars from the two previous outings made a third film inevitable, and despite the on-screen decade changing to encompass a prequel, the basic voyeuristic concept stays exactly the same. In their first fictional feature-length debut, Catfish directors Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman take over the reins of the popular franchise and while they infuse their own directorial sensibilities upon the project, it ultimately fails to both engage and frighten the audience to any satisfying, bowel-movement inducing degree.
The year is 1988 and Katie (Chloe Csengery) and Kristi (Jessica Tyler Brown) are two seemingly normal sisters who are looked after by their mother Julie (Lauren Bittner) and their step-father Dennis (Christopher Nicholas Smith). After numerous things go bump in the night, Dennis decides to set video cameras up at various locations throughout their home including their own marital bedroom, the young girl’s room and the downstairs living area. As the day and nights go by, video enthusiast Dennis along with help from his technologically savvy friend Randy (Dustin Ingram), begin to notice that all is not what it seems within the household and that a malevolent being may be specifically targeting members of his family. What takes place next comprises of loud noises, unexplained moving objects and another edition to the paranormal franchise in which the audience slowly experiences a family’s descent into madness as they try to both understand and overcome their experiences at hand.
The third film in the Paranormal Activity series isn’t a terrible film by any standards, but it does fail exponentially in two key areas. First of all, the third film of the scare-inducing trilogy offers up absolutely nothing that is new or innovative in any way, shape or form. The closest Joost and Schulman come in attempting to conjure up a bit of ingenuity is in the use of a mounted camcorder on top of a rotating axis, yet this device is severely underused and instead they opt more for the use of on and off-screen diegetic sound effects. While the narrative itself starts to become interesting as it slowly opens a revealing door of uncertainty to the viewer, potentially exposing what may be behind over two decades of terror in the lives of these two young women. But it instead opts to cut ties during the final act leaving many questions unanswered leading to underwhelming end to the potentially exciting exploration of the mythology behind over two decades of paranormal activity.
Secondly, if audience members have seen the first two films then they will well versed in how the series approach scaring the paying members of a theater senseless. The scene shifts from hand-held filming to a stationary shot during the night as the members of the family sleep, before an extended period, usually between thirty seconds and a minute, of absolutely nothing happening is utilized to emphasize the vulnerability of the characters, and then the ‘scare’ happens. Whether it is a banging door or screeching off-screen diegetic sounds, or some form of unexplained paranormal phenomenon such as levitation, after the first two films this predictability becomes ingrained within the viewer and it is easy to simply evade the scare because you can adequately predict when it is going to come. Aside from two sequences in which Joost and Schulman change the record so-to-speak and provide two very well crafted scenes, the majority of reuses the exact same format as the previous two films and therefore becomes stale, and most often than not, predictable.
Joost and Schulman have essentially created a re-hash of the first two films, except with young children replacing the older, more mature leading characters of the previous installments. Both young girls give exceptional performances considering the majority of the film hinges upon their interaction with the world around them, and the film itself is competently composed, even if the two decade old tapes do look like they have been meticulously preserved in a state of perpetual perfection. But, it is first and foremost a film within the prosperous horror genre, and Paranormal Activity 3 fails on a fundamental level to provide any substance, any originality, or any scares that manage to eclipse the terror of previous two films and add a new level of horror to the already spine-chilling series.
C-
(4.5/10)














6 Comments
Definitely better than the second one and even though it’s a little bit of the same thing around again, it still is totally freaky and has so many chilling moments that will stay in your mind forever. Good review Jordan. I liked this a lot more than I was expecting and I just hope that this next one that they are having, doesn’t get too dumb with its story.
Thank you for the praise Dan, I’d probably agree that, as a film, it is better than the second, but to me personally, I found the second more frightening in the respect that my mind was still open to possibilities of the ‘Paranormal’ franchise.
I saw only the first one before I went to see this one. I was actually quite freaked out by a couple scenes, the one where everything in the kitchen came crashing down, and the one where the older daughter and the friend were in the bathroom when everything started shaking. Totally freaked me out.
But I do agree there was little difference or surprise. And of course, the mom/wife doesn’t believe stuff is actually happening for a long time. It’s kinda frustrating watching. But I will say that I think I was far more creeped out by the first one because I watched it at home instead. I think the franchise is better watched at home than at the theater because it makes it much more chilling and personal.
Nice review, Jordan.
Again Kristin thanks for the praise and I’ll definitely agree with you in that respect because I first saw the original ‘Paranormal’ like yourself at home, at around 11:30pm at night with all the lights off and nobody else within the vicinity, and I found that it exploited my vulnerabilites to no end and worked very well. And from that you have just convinced me to watch the third film again, but this time under the conditions in which I watched the first and see if it improves my experience at all.
I don’t think any of the Paranormal Activity films have scared me or caused me to jump. Yet, I still find myself going to the cinema to watch. Why? It’s always funny to see other people get scared half to death!
I did prefer this 3rd to the 2nd. The 2nd bored me and really frustrated me. Not really looking forward to a 4th, but you know I’ll be there in the cinema when it’s released.
What I always noticed was that what scenes were used in the trailer weren’t always exactly the same as the ones used in the film. There were always little differences!
Oh and if you want to see a decent found footage film, check out The Last Exorcism. Provided a few minor jumps for me, but it went somewhere I never thought it would have.
Great review
…that’s a shame although I’m a sucker for these types of films so I’ll have to check it out sooner rather than later.
Trackbacks