Josh Trank’s ‘Chronicle’ A Unique Twist on the ‘Found Footage’ Genre
I think it is safe to call Chronicle, the ‘first-person footage’ sci-fi fantasy, written by Max Landis and directed by Josh Trank, a very pleasant surprise. The real-world superhero plot feels like it has been done to death, but watching three high school classmates come to terms with super powers (documented almost-completely through the camera skills of one of the gang) is smart, unique, engaging and technically innovative.
Three high-school classmates: Andrew (Dan DeHaan), a shy, unpopular and socially alienated outcast, his psychology-infatuated cousin, Matt (Alex Russell, Wasted on the Young), and School President candidate, Steve (Michael B. Jordan), investigate a suspicious hole in the ground at a rave party. Exposed to a mysterious substance, they find themselves in the possession of inexplicable super powers. Sure enough, as they learn the extent of their abilities, their ordinary lives take on an extraordinary turn.
Initially they use their powers to play innocent pranks on themselves and people around them, but gradually gain confidence with their abilities, which makes them invulnerable (with the exception of frequent nose bleeds). Their shared secret and new-found sense of immorality forces them to evaluate how they are utilizing their powers, and ultimately decide where to draw the line about how far they should go. Their bonds are tested when one of the gang starts utilizing his power for darker deeds.
Firstly, I thought the cast was solid, with each of the youngsters giving their characters a distinct likeability and relatability, drawing sympathy when their lives start to unravel as a result of their mutual experiences, and the distrust that begins to develop. DeHaan, particularly, shows a lot of talent. It is interesting to note that Michael Kelly, a longtime character actor, has a small role as Andrew’s abusive father.
One of the film’s themes (and it’s largely ignored directly) is the prevalence of new technologies (iPhones, iPads etc.) that allow people to record and comment on every event in their lives, sharing their every emotion and opinion with the world, no matter how mundane. It is never revealed why Andrew becomes obsessed with filming everything (perhaps to document his father’s abuse, or to put up some sort of barrier between himself and the displeasure of his existence) but for the sake of the story, he actively desires to chronicle their lives and his camera is always present. Luckily, there are only a few occasions when his footage is unwarranted. In most footage films, there are always instances where the ‘filming’ seems unnecessary, but being what they are, it remains in the film.

After taking his camera to school and revealing where his locker is and where he eats lunch, the focus of his footage becomes much more fascinating and as a result, there are some really extraordinary captures. One where Andrew and Steve fall from the clouds, after nearly being taken out by a plane, is one spectacular example. There are some really inventive camera innovations – Andrew develops the ability to control this camera and often has it floating above the actors as they converse – and the visual effects were very impressive.
What is interesting about the script is the way each of these characters utilize their powers, and how their individual lives impacts on and influences their willingness to use their abilities. The aggravation and humiliation Andrew’s peers and his abusive father cause him, as he also struggles to cope with his mother’s sickness, results in him using his powers recklessly and ultimately in a self-destructive fashion.
There were plenty of early laughs, and watching the three leads (who have a playful chemistry) learn to harness their unique power is very entertaining. But with powers such as the ones they develop; highly skilled telekinesis, increased motor functioning, meaning they can influence their bodies to complete almost any function (including flying at great heights), and the ability to control any object, there is continued risk of accidents (one close scrape with a truck driver), being discovered, or impulsively using their gifts maliciously. Here we see a group of ordinary kids stumble across some unique abilities, but then struggle as individuals to harness their powers when faced with the pressures of their own reality.
Chronicle is let down slightly by a corny romantic subplot involving Matt’s character and a video blogger from school, conveniently allowing the film to shift over to her footage whenever Andrew wasn’t present with his camera in hand. Then, I really don’t know who was filming the concluding sequences. Was it meant to be a collaboration of witnesses using hand-held electronic devices to capture the events? I’m not sure. The surprisingly dark turn made in the final third, though conflict had adequately been set up, still felt unjustifiably extreme.
I felt like the second half was less successful, and it seemed like the filmmakers had crafted this unique idea, but didn’t quite know where to take it. Considering where a lot of big-budget superhero films end up, this has similarities in that it becomes a hero/villain struggle – but unique considering where the villain has come from, and what their now-mastered abilities allow them to do. Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed Chronicle. The cast was great, and considering the budget (pretty miniscule) the visual effects and technical innovations were impressive. A solid addition to the ‘found footage’ genre, though I don’t know if that description is entirely accurate here, and well worth a look.
B-
(3.5/5)













18 Comments
This sounds like something i would like
Good review Andrew. The whole found-footage concept is getting old but this seems to transcend the limitations of the genre. Seems like it’s getting a pretty decent Rotten Tomatoes score but still more of a rental for me. I’ll look forward to it though
It has a decent Rotten Tomatoes score – and most are agreeing that it is a clever blending of superhero film, with youth/family drama, but utilising the first-hand footage of one of the protagonists. This gimmick could get a bit tiring, and it certainly limits the scope of the film. I had some issues with the final 20mins, but overall, I was entertained. It’s worth checking out on DVD.
I agree with Castor, I’m beginning to get found-footage-film-fatigue so it’s good that there’s some people out there trying to bring something new to the genre. Might give this a go when it heads to the small screen here.
I wouldn’t really call it a ‘found footage’ film because no one really finds the footage. The film is made up of ‘on-the-fly’ captures from the protagonists, bystanders, surveillance footage etc. and it becomes a little silly with this gimmick near the end, but for the most part it is really inventive, and the visual effects are excellent.
Oh I am really looking forward to seeing this over the coming week. Looks aces!!
Great review Mr B
Cheers Scott. Hope you enjoy it!
…this film definitely sounds interesting. Good piece Andrew.
But what astonishes me is that films like this are getting made. If a first time screenwriter is working on a screenplay, what studio exec would commission a script based on another superhero film given the flood of them already existing or in production. Furthermore, a superhero film based on anonymous heroes not associated to any well-know comic book. It seems to be the way these days to rehash the same stories with subtle differences – the Let The Right One In/Let Me In and Girl With the Dragon Tattoo films are definite indications of this in the Hollywood remake arena.
It shows us there’s more to found footage than horror that’s for sure. I’m glad it’s getting positive buzz. It’s a good, albeit familiar (X-Men based), story that succeeds because if focuses on the human rather than the superhuman. It does go a little Akira at the end but this is a champion for found footage films. Also the video quality is low end HD so the off-putting graininess and shakey cam stuff is pretty non existent…also Andrew’s control of the camera like a ‘familiar’ almost is pretty neat so you do get all three characters in front of the camera…not like Cloverield for instance.
I hope this does so well!
I hope it does well, for all the reasons you mentioned Marc. Solid entertainment, and quite clever considering the fact that the superhero and found-footage genres are pretty stacked at the moment.
The twist and major tone shift from the first half of the film to the second was a bit much for me, but I still enjoyed the film quite a bit. I’d say B- is a great rating!
Nice review Andrew.
Yeah, that is the main reason why I felt the film suffered. Thanks Matt!
…this is getting some rave reviews in the UK so I’m looking forward to seeing it. Although found footage films are becoming a bit too frequent for my liking I’m hoping this uses the concept in an interesting way.
The initial reviews were red hot, though they have cooled recently. It still has a pretty decent Rotten Tomatoes score. I think you will be impressed by the way it uses its footage, Dan!
Great review, I wholeheartedly agree with every word. I mean, seriously, did they really need to invent Casey (was that her name) just so they could shift the action away when Andrew wasn’t present…
Thanks Man. Yeah, I can’t remember what her name was, but it was very…convenient.
This film surprised me too. The whole Found Footage genre is definitely hit and miss (more on the latter) but this is definitely a hit. I wasn’t too thrilled with the rather cheesy ending (it should have ended about three minutes earlier) but overall, a surprisingly well done work.
I thought the last 20 minutes went a bit too far, but for the most part it was pretty reserved. I was satisfied, overall. I am a bit of a fan of the found-footage genre (though not the Paranormal Activity films), and I think this is one of my favourites. It works because the kids are relatable, and have a lot of fun with their roles – and I thought the effects were very good. An unexpected early gem.
Trackbacks