RSS Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Archives

LAMB #393

Large Association of Movie Blogs

1001 Movies Club

Grade Scale

  • A+: Never say never
  • A: A masterpiece
  • A-: A near-masterpiece
  • B+: Very good movie
  • B: Good movie but some minor flaws
  • B-: Pretty good but some flaws
  • C+: Slightly above average
  • C: Average
  • C-: Mediocre
  • D: Bad movie!!!
  • F: Atrocious, avoid at all cost!

Movie News: Weekly Round-up

Movie News:

  • Daredevil reboot on the way (Hero Complex)
  • Red Skull confirmed as villain in Captain America (Collider)
  • Sequel to Valentine’s Day already in the works… (First Showing)
  • Mr. and Mrs. Jones prequel to Mr. and Mrs. Smith coming (Vulture)
  • 24 movie in the works (Variety)
  • Mission Impossible 4 with Tom Cruise (Deadline)
  • Disney shortening theatrical run for Alice in Wonderland to 13 weeks (Hollywood Reporter)
  • Next Spider-Man will be released in 2012 (First Showing)

Casting News:

  • Cate Blanchett, Eric Bana cast in Hanna (Deadline)
  • Jake Gyllenhaal, Jim Carrey cast in Damn Yankees (Deadline)
  • Taylor Lautner cast as Stretch Armstrong (Deadline)
  • Amber Heard, William Fichtner join Drive Angry 3-D (Collider)
  • Sam Worthington cast in The Fields (THR)

  • Kate Winslet, Marion Cottilard, Jude Law join Matt Damon in action thriller Contagion (Deadline)
  • Tim Robbins joins Green Lantern cast as Dr. Hammond’s dad (Heat Vision)
  • Rachel Weisz cast in Dream House (Variety)
  • Katherine Heigl joins One for the Money (Variety)
  • Penelope Cruz joins Lars von Trier’s movie Melancholia (First Showing)
  • Emily Browning in Sleeping Beauty (The Playlist)
  • Penelope Cruz joins the cast of Pirates of the Caribbean 4 (Heat Vision)
  • Ryan Gosling joins Drive (Empire)

Trailers:

  • Kevin Smith’s Cop Out (First Showing)
  • Luc Besson’s Adele Blanc-Sec (Allocine)
  • Atom Egoyan’s Chloe (Yahoo)
  • Neil Jordan’s Ondine (YouTube)
  • M. Night Shyamalan’s The Last Airbender (Yahoo)
  • Robert Luketic’s Killers (Yahoo)

Movie Review: Funny People (2009)

The third movie directed by, supposedly, the savior of comedy Judd Apatow, Funny People is an intermittently engaging movie starring Adam Sandler, Seth Rogen, Eric Bana, and the annoying same crew of actors that populate the dozen movies or so that have come out the last few years with Apatow’s stamp of approval.

Adam Sandler is George Simmons, a movie star very much like Adam Sandler himself, making highly popular low-grade comedies, getting stopped everywhere he goes by regular people wanting an autograph or a picture. Simmons hates his life, he is a wealthy self-absorbed man with no close friends, no family, and no companionship. At the start of the movie, he is on his way to the doctor and he gets the news that he has a rare form of Leukemia and that he should start an experimental treatment as soon as possible, foregoing more traditional treatments like radiations or chemotherapy. Depressed by the news, Simmons decides to return to his roots as a stand-up comedian. That’s where he meets Ira (Rogen), a naive and not-so talented comedian, whom he hires as his personal assistant/joke writer. The two develop some sort of friendship and even though Simmons likes to remind Ira that he is the boss every once in a while, we think Simmons may well be under way to become a decent human being after all. He makes peace with Laura, the former love of his life and seems to recognize the wrong he has done by being so selfish and self-centered. Then one day, he gets the news that he is not sick anymore. Did Simmons really learned anything from his brush with death? Not really because he now decides to hook up with Laura (Leslie Mann), now married and with two children.

funny_people_1

Funny People is the tale of two movies compacted into one: the first one about the unglamorous behind-the-scene life of (not so funny) comedians in Tinseltown and Simmons’ return to that life as a guy who made it. The second one  is a sub-par romantic drama/comedy with no depth crammed into the last hour of the movie. Apatow tries to demonstrate that he can be successful with more dramatic material injected with little bits of his brand of comedy. He ends up failing at both with a movie that is neither thoroughly funny, nor moving. The movie is amusing in little spurts which are not sustained. Worse is that the movie is only a long list of jokes about penises, balls, and farts. The stand-up scenes (there is plenty of them) will mostly leave you indifferent. Running at nearly two hours and a half, the movie is badly edited and about 40 to 60 minutes too long. Given the fact that Apatow has his two daughters and his wife (Mann) playing in the movie, it could be that the movie is some sort of semi-autobiography of Apatow’s own life which would explain why this movie is overly self-indulging and pleased with itself.

The movie is by no means bad. Apatow doesn’t fall into the trap of letting the movie go into “they lived happily thereafter” territory where the main character comes close to dying but doesn’t and starts mending his dysfunctional life back together. Simmons softens but only to a point and ends up regressing to become even more of a lonely self-centered jerk by the end. Although the characters are quite unlikeable, the performances from the cast are solid and compelling. Adam Sandler doesn’t have great drama range but stays within his limit and is surprisingly convincing as George Simmons. Seth Rogen gives a solid performance as the wide-eyed Ira. Leslie Mann plays her usual beautiful but slighly crazy wife role which she has mastered while Eric Bana is fairly funny as the over-the-top Australian douchebag husband. The Apatow Crew is… the Apatow Crew with Jonah Hill and Jason Schwartzman playing their usual nerd roles. There is also a long list of people in cameos from Eminem to Ray Romano. Again, mildly amusing but they didn’t bring much to the film and could have been left on the cutting room floor.

Production value are above average and your usual Apatow treatment. Although Apatow takes a risk venturing outside his raunchy type of comedy, it’s still a downer that you can watch the dozen of movie that Apatow had a hand in and you can tell right away from the cast and overall atmosphere given by the cinematography, musical score, sets and costumes that he had something to do with the movie. Where is the originality? How rewarding is it to watch a one-trick pony using the same set of people, doing the same set of comedy tricks, and the same “feel” and formula of how the movie was made dozen and dozen of times?

For a movie billed as a comedy, (not so) Funny People is only mildly amusing and only in little spurts marred by large sequences of hollow melodrama… unless you like jokes about penises and farts because there is plenty of those. Blame it on Judd Apatow.

C+

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 7.0/10 (2 votes cast)

Movie Review: The Time Traveler's Wife (2009)

The Time Traveler’s Wife is a romantic drama directed by Robert Schwentke, adapted from Audrey Niffenegger’s bestseller of the same name. Adapting a novel with complex elements and undertones to the silver screen is a daunting task and director Robert Schwentke struggled to compromise between satisfying readers of the novel and making the movie accessible to people unfamiliar with the book. Overall, the movie has some significant directing and screenwriting flaws but does make for an unpretentious and above-average romantic tragedy thanks to its two compelling leads.

Synopsis: The Time Traveler’s Wife is the time-defying love story of Henry DeTamble (Eric Bana) and Clare Abshire (Rachel McAdams). Henry is a librarian afflicted with a genetic disease that causes him to travel through time more or less randomly. Henry’s random and unpredictable escapades are often dangerous, terrifying and sometimes life-threatening ordeals because he ends up buck-naked and starving in unknown places and times. For those reasons, Henry keeps himself in top physical shape and taught “himself” all type of survival skills such as pick-pocketing, street fighting, or picking locks. After a random while, he always goes back to his “present” but is largely unable to affect his future. At age 28, he meets 20-yr old Clare Abshire. He doesn’t know her but she has known him since she was 6 and has been waiting for him all her life and will do so the rest of her life…

The main weaknesses of the movie can be traced back to trying to fit the book into 107 minutes. Director Robert Schwentke and screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin appeared over-matched and took the path of least resistance, oversimplifying the plot and characters. Screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin made some compromises to keep the movie from becoming excessively long or inaccessible to its PG-13 audience, which resulted in significant structural flaws. Even though the movie is nearly two hours long, it feels jumpy and too short as if we are skimming through the plotline. Although the main events and characters of the book were translated to the big screen, non-essential characters such as Kimi or Ingrid were completely omitted and the ending was slightly altered (and I liked it better!). The supporting characters are a mere passing thoughts, the key relationship between Clare and Gomez is one-dimensional. Even the two main characters, Henry and Clare, are under-developed. Ideally, the direction of the movie should have been given to a director with better credentials, and the movie extended up to 140 minutes to develop the characters fully and take advantage of the terrific cast.

Despite those shortcomings, The Time Traveler’s Wife is one of those movies you can’t help but like. It is at heart a simple star-crossed love story with a refreshing sci-fi twist that touches on universal themes such as fate/free will, true love, and loss. A story that focused on the depth of the characters’ love, not its showiness. Their will to move forward and enjoy every minute they have with each other before Henry’s impending fate. This meant more close-up shots and a more realistic exploration of what it means to be Henry and Clare. The movie succeeds in moving the audience thanks in big part to moving performances from the two leads, who surrendered themselves fully to the premise of the novel.

The Time Traveler’s Wife stars the fetching Rachel McAdams as the title character. Most will have missed her terrific performance in the 2008 indie The Lucky Ones and this puts her back on the radar for mainstream audiences. Beside matching the physical description of her character in the book, McAdams has an unusual ability to make underwritten characters feel real and genuinely vulnerable. In less talented hands, Clare could easily have turned into a self-pitying weeper but McAdams infuses her with a quiet strength of spirit. Overcoming a surprisingly thinly written character, she carries the emotional weight of the movie and was luminous portraying Clare’s spirit and unyielding love for Henry’s despite being riddled with some terrible lines once again. Will someone give Rachel McAdams a meatier role for God’s sake??? Eric Bana was a pleasant surprise, exceeding my expectations and making for a solid Henry. Although he does not fit the physical description of the book (Henry is more runner than football player) Bana’s Henry was tormented, introverted, poignant, and more importantly, had solid chemistry with his co-star. The only issue I had was that Henry was mostly a one-note character and it would have helped to have him be a little more lively and eccentric. The supporting cast was solid albeit given very little opportunity to be memorable. Gomez (Ron Livingstone) was a pivotal character in the book but merely a passing thought in the movie. Jane McLean as Charisse, Arliss Howard as Henry’s father, Stephen Tobolowsky as Dr. Kendrick all did a fine job with the small parts they had.

The cinematography has a beautiful stark and cold quality to it which reinforce the tragic nature of the movie. The movie was beautifully shot by Florian Ballhaus and is the strongest attribute of the movie behind its leads. The crafty camera-work (already apparent in the trailer) using motion and placement selection gave a particular tone to his scenes and Schwentke used that to his advantage in the film, giving the movie a light touch of eerie fantasy. The ending of the movie, a fitting play on the beginning of the love story, is sublimely shot and Rachel McAdams absolutely nails it. The CGI effects of Henry’s time traveling are unspectacular but first rate while the overused musical score was melancholic, adding to the tragic tone of the movie.

Enjoy the Time Traveler’s Wife for what it is: an old-fashioned love story with an unusual sci-fi twist. It may not be exactly like the book, it may have been darker and heavier on the sci-fi, and it may have been so much more with better direction. Even so, the premise of the story, and the perfectly-cast leads make this movie well-worth the ride and will keep your imagination lingering long afterward.

Boasting solid performances from Rachel McAdams and Eric Bana, The Time Traveler’s Wife is a structurally flawed but charming, endearing and bittersweet romantic drama nonetheless. I admit it, it got me pretty good ;)

B

Notes: PG-13 for thematic elements, brief disturbing images, brief nudity and sexuality, 107 minutes.

Disclaimer: Comment area may contain spoilers

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 7.8/10 (5 votes cast)

Movie Preview: The Time Traveler's Wife (2009)

The Time Traveler’s Wife has been shoved around the post-production pipeline for a year now and it finally looks like it will come out this summer. I’m making a small space for it because I read the hugely popular book by Audrey Niffenegger a while back and was really fascinated by all the possibilities of the whole time-traveling aspect of Henry DeTamble, who time-travels randomly against his will due to some genetic anomaly and the consequence of such things on the love of his life, Clare Abshire. Although it would be amazing to travel a few months into the future and see where the stock market is, Henry’s time traveling is more often than not a terrifying and dangerous ordeal. Actually, in the book, it’s shortly mentioned that making a killing on the stock market is how they afford their lifestyle.
In short, Henry time-travels unpredictably and always end up buck-naked, in more-or-less random places which makes for often-dangerous situations. For that reason, Henry keeps himself in top physical shape and he taught “himself” all kind of survival skills such as street fighting, pickpocketing, picking locks etc… Despite that, he sometimes comes back beaten up, bloodied, or worse. The key about Henry is that he always goes back to his “present” after a few minutes, hours, or days. At age 28, he finally meets Clare Abshire, 20, he has never met her but she has known him since she was 6. She has been waiting for him all her life and will continue to do so the rest of her life. The book touches on many interesting themes such as fate/free-will/chaos, the timelessness of love, waiting for your loved one, life and death… Themes that really drew me in because of my choice to pursue a military career.

I’ve been a fan of Eric Bana especially since his incredibly tormented performance in Munich, so he should make for a solid Henry. I really hope they also show his darker side because he was an interestingly flawed character: selfish and brooding even though he loved his wife very deeply. Casting Rachel McAdams as Clare is a dream come true because she IS Clare Abshire: the voice, pale skin, green eyes, persona, just like in the book.

From the trailer, it looks like they focused more on the romance and more particularly on Clare’s character which is fine because it’s a love story after all. What’s already ticking me off from the trailer is that Henri tells Clare about Alba. In the book, Henri tries his hardest not to tell Clare about Alba, despite tremendous harship from trying to conceive a child. Nevertheless, as long as they kept the same dark ending as the book and stayed mostly true to the story, it should be a decent movie. There is no way they could have fitted all that happened in the book in the movie and it could end up being a sappy mainstream tearjerker like the Notebook which would not give justice to the book because TTTW really is equal part sci-fi and romance and is oriented to both male and female readers and although, the end can get you uh… choked up, the book is not sappy at all. Oh well, we will see…


The Time Traveler’s Wife (August 14)

Movie Review: Star Trek (2009)

I just saw the latest Star Trek, directed by JJ Abrams. Needless to say it brings new life to the old franchise of the same name. First of all, aside from basic common knowledge, I’ve never been a Star Trek fan, never seen any of the previous movies (apparently, there was 10!!!) or even a single full episode of the TV series so forgive me if I don’t see the whole picture.

The movie uses the recently popular fad of going back to the roots of the franchise and telling the story of how it begun (cough* Star Wars cough) but unlike that movie that shall not be named, it actually was superbly done. Mixing well-timed humor with a solid plotline and stunning action scenes, the movie was indeed very entertaining. The entire cast is solid overall but kudos to Simon Pegg (Scotty) and Anton Yeltsin (Ensign Chekov) because they stole the limelights in every scene they were in. Chris Pine was not overwhelming but decent as a young James Kirk which was all that was needed to not let down. Also freaking Eric Bana plays the bad guy, I did not recognize him at all in two hours until I came home to check who it was.


The movie had plenty of good things going for it. From magnificent action scenes to a at least decent acting from everyone on the cast to include a well-structured plot and an epic story. Maybe I had too high expectations but some weaknesses here and there as well as a giant WTF moment:
- James Tiberius Kirk childhood, being the usual cocky Hollywood rebel genius, come on…
- A freaking black hole forming weapon called “Red matter” (wow don’t strain yourself there writers)
- Iowa still being a wasteland a couple hundreds of years from now… (wait actually it makes sense but I had to say it)
- Fight scenes with little pee-wee guns, swords and (gasp) fist. If I know I’m going for a fight, I would take a rifle, a bazooka, something…
- Plenty of other incongruities related to science but anyways it’s a movie…
- In the parachute scene where that third guy dies in an epic fail moment, this had to be the ultimate WTF sequence in movie history, I don’t even know if it was supposed to be funny or tragic or sad? If anything, it should have been that massive ego Kirk doing that, and dying like a retard freak.

I debated whether to give this a B+ or a A-, I liked the movie a great deal but I wasn’t blown away. Weird feeling that something is missing. I will say one last thing, I was entertained and I enjoyed the movie … but I probably won’t be thinking much more about the movie tomorrow morning (except for that dude dying the stupidest death in movie history). I have seen some fairly average movie that stimulated my mind a whole lot more than this movie, that’s why I will give it a B+.

B+: Entertaining, mythical, solid plot, solid casting, brilliant action scenes and eye candy, and a solid foundation for future movies.

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 9.0/10 (5 votes cast)