RSS Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Archives

LAMB #393

Large Association of Movie Blogs

1001 Movies Club

Grade Scale

  • A+: Never say never
  • A: A masterpiece
  • A-: A near-masterpiece
  • B+: Very good movie
  • B: Good movie but some minor flaws
  • B-: Pretty good but some flaws
  • C+: Slightly above average
  • C: Average
  • C-: Mediocre
  • D: Bad movie!!!
  • F: Atrocious, avoid at all cost!

Envelope Director's Roundtable

A great roundtable with Kathryn Bigelow (“The Hurt Locker”), James Cameron (“Avatar”), Lee Daniels (“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”), Jason Reitman (“Up in the Air”) and Quentin Tarantino (“Inglourious Basterds”). If you are interested in getting to know a little more about how these successful directors think, I would highly recommend reading/watching the 90-minute interview.

One of the most interesting part was about the importance of casting and auditioning. Cameron says that casting is the single most important decision involved in making a movie. Furthermore, even highly accomplished directors like Tarantino and Cameron still audition for their characters:

Don’t Miss the Jump >>

Continue reading Envelope Director’s Roundtable »

Movie Review: Titanic (1997)

Directed by James Cameron, Titanic was the highest grossing movie ever until Avatar dethroned it only recently. This is a movie that everyone loves to hate now but I remember back in 1997 when everyone saw it in theater, sometime multiple times, it was a goddamn smashing success. I eventually went to see it weeks after the open (I was not a movie buff back then lol) and as an impressionable kid, I was pretty blown away too.

The movie starts in a modern day setting as researchers are exploring the wreck of the Titanic for long lost treasures. All they find, after discovering a safe, is a hand-drawn picture of a nude woman with a massive diamond necklace around her neck. They are stunned when that same woman, now 101 years old, calls them, wishing to get on board of their ship. The flashback begins as she tells the story of what happened on those fateful days leading up to the tragedy. Rose DeWitt Bukater (Kate Winslet) is a young upper-class woman. Although she and her mother appear wealthy, they are burdened by debt and she is being forced to marry “Cal” Hockey (Billy Zane), the arrogant and controlling son of a steel tycoon, to erase her family’s debt. Depressed and distraught, she attempts to jump off the ship but a young man prevents her from doing so. The man is Jack Dawson (Leonardo DiCaprio), a free-spirited artist without a penny. The two soon become friends and then lovers… There you have it, a star-crossed love story that “transcends” social and economic classes and is set within the backdrop of the sinking of the Titanic.

Titanic was at the time the most expensive movie ever made with a budget of $200 million. The best aspect of the movie is all the details that went with recreating the ship and its sinking on screen. From the costumes to the furniture and silverware, Cameron really succeeded in immersing the viewer and making him/her part of the movie. The movie is visually spectacular from beginning to end. The disaster part of the movie is simply fantastic and you really live the tragedy through each of the characters. What would one do in such a large scale catastrophe? Cameron does a great job of keeping most of the focus on the two main characters. We never stop caring for them even in the midst of the disaster.

Unfortunately, this movie was extremely ambitious and not everything worked out as well as others. Structurally, the entire modern day subplot should simply have been edited out, easily saving 30 minutes of screen time. Thinking back, it brought absolutely nothing to the movie and for a movie to be well over 3 hours, every single scene must be in the movie for a really good reason. Additionally, it removed the suspense of knowing whether Rose would survive the disaster.

The script written by Cameron himself, albeit effective, is just overly simplistic, unoriginal and full of cliches. Every characters that comes on screen are stereotypical caricatures. The wealthy are all greedy and haughty, despising the poor and being selfish because of their social status. The poor are all essentially good-natured, noble and compassionate. Basically, everything is black and white with no shades of gray, dumbed down and manipulated so the viewer has absolutely nothing to reflect about.

The love story between Jack and Rose is a merely average romance. The two actors have very good chemistry together and we don’t have to wonder why Rose would fall in love with Jack. However, some of the dialogues they have felt extremely contrived and flat. The two characters simply don’t seem to have much to talk about (a scene about learning to spit???) and all the blame goes directly to Cameron’s lazy writing. It also doesn’t help that Cal, played by Billy Zane is a completely one-dimensional archetype: he is the most arrogant, snobbish and evil fiance on Earth and there is absolutely no redeeming quality about him. Imagine if Cal was actually a decent guy who might have taken Rose for granted but then realizes he is losing her, and corrects himself. As far as romantic tension goes, even though we all know who Rose is ultimately going to choose, it would have made the movie so much more enthralling not being sure what she was going to do. Those are the two main aspects about the romance that hamper the movie most.

But then, why did this movie rack up so much money? Why all the love?  Why eleven Academy Awards? Titanic is by no means a bad movie. Despite all its limitations, the movie does everything it needs to do effectively. An unoriginal but solid emotional core, two charismatic leads, universal themes, stunningly beautiful visuals, a great soundtrack, and a massive disaster that has fascinated the world since 1912. Cameron is more a great manipulator than a great director. He understands exactly what the masses want to see in their movies and he simply delivers time and time again. Jack represents the little guy, freedom, passion, purity of spirit and everyone pulls for him to get Rose, who seem to be his perfect match. Cal represents everything that could be wrong with a man. Greedy, morally corrupted, overbearing, jealous, he obviously has no redeeming quality which makes him the clear cut antagonist. Rose chooses freedom over slavery, Jack sacrifices his life so his beloved one lives. The masses yearned for a movie like this and Cameron delivered it.

Production values are all first-rate as you would expect from a big budget movie. The CGI effects are still fairly satisfactory more than a decade after. The photography is grandiose and breathtaking, while the musical score by James Horner is haunting and still one of the most recognizable to this day.

A well-executed melodrama set in the grandiose backdrop of one of the greatest tragedy in history, Titanic is a timeless epic despite a relatively average and unoriginal central romance that feels flat and contrived.

B

Notes: Rated PG-13 for disaster related peril and violence, nudity, sensuality and brief language. 194 minutes

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 8.8/10 (11 votes cast)

Movie News of the Week

Robocop Delayed:

Darren Aronofsky’s “RoboCop” remake has been put on hold. Apparently, MGM now wants a 3D movie while Aronofsky absolutely oppose the idea. I would not be surprised if he gets canned, unfortunately.

Avatar Sequel:

James Cameron confirmed that there will be a sequel. What a surprise!

New Kick-Ass Theatrical Trailer:

I am definitely warming up to this movie after seeing this trailer! I’m going to send you over to Branden’s blog to watch the trailer.

Spider-Man 4 Postponed Indefinitely:

There has been rumors circulating for about 3 weeks that Spider-Man 4 was encountering pre-production troubles and those are now confirmed. A disagreement between Director Sam Raimi and Sony is likely behind the postponement. Raimi is reportedly unhappy about the script and more specifically who the villains are going to be. I can’t blame him after he was forced by the studio to add Venom to Spider-Man 3. The  scheduled release slot in May 2011 has been filled with Thor.

More News:

Movie Review: Avatar (2009)

A technologically advanced civilization shows up in a previously virgin place full of highly desirable resources but the native and “primitive” population is sitting right on top of it and is unwilling to move. Naturally, this native population lives in harmony with nature while the new comers destroy everything in sight with no regards. One of the young newcomers falls in love with the native princess and has to straddle the line between two colliding worlds. In case you are wondering, this is not a review of Pocahontas or Dance with the Wolves but James Cameron’s new movie Avatar.

Avatar_Tree_of_Life

Avatar is set in 2154 AD on Pandora, a moon in the Alpha Centauri system which is home to the Na’vi, a “primitive” indigenous population of giant blue dudes and dudettes who are twice as tall as the average human being and quite frankly more awesome physically. The Na’vi live in complete harmony with their natural surroundings and only take what they need without wasting. Fortunately, some nameless corporation has set up a colony there to show them how it’s done back home in America. Pandora is also rich with Unobtainium (I’m not making that one up), a precious mineral for which humans will do anything for. Unfortunately, those stinky blue people live right on top of a massive quantity of this resource and that’s where the Avatar program comes in. In a diplomatic effort to solve the tense situation without turning the ground all blue and mushy, human scientists such as Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver) were able to create avatars, human-Na’vi hybrid clones, which can be mentally controlled by its human owner. Those Avatars can then used to gain the trust of the local populace and convince them to relocate. Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), a paraplegic Marine, is sent to take control of his now-defunct twin brother’s avatar. He visits the world of Pandora and is enamored to be able to use “his” legs again. Jake soon is transformed by this alien culture and falls in love with alien Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), who teaches him how to live in harmony with nature, and forces him to question his loyalties.

The highly anticipated Avatar has been in the works for some 15 years as James Cameron has been waiting for the technology to catch up to his vision of how the movie should look. The production cost which was reported to be around $237 million doesn’t make this movie the most expensive in history but add in $150 million for marketing and promotion and it does make for a pretty expensive price tag which may or may not be fully recouped. Anyways, let’s put it aside right away: I saw Avatar in 3D and it is a visual feast well beyond anything that can be seen currently and probably for the next 24 to 36 months. Much like seeing the liquid metal effect in Terminator 2 for the first time nearly twenty years ago, watching Avatar’s world will blow your mind the same way. The Na’vi computer-animated characters are as flawless and realistic as the real actors. The eerie world of Pandora is lush with strange looking vegetation, intriguing wildlife and those are so photo-realistic, it rarely looks like you are watching extended CGI sequences. The 3D glasses provided are fairly sturdy and decent but do dim the picture a little bit. When will we get non-dark 3D glasses or better… real 3D screens?

Avatar_still_07

Avatar’s technical mastery is one brilliant aspect of the movie, however when you come back to basic story-telling principles the movie is overly predictable and uses too many cliches. Hang on to your seat because I will say it: Take away the phenomenal visuals and you have a fairly ordinary movie. Most of the turn of events are telegraphed from 10 miles away. The climactic 20-minute ending, although spectacular, is only an all-out battle scene with fancy explosions and military hardware. It feels like the story was used to showcase the visuals and not the other way around. There is a few feeble attempts here and there to lighten up the mood that extracted only a few soft chuckles from our audience. The movie also pushes a green agenda and attempt to comment on a profit-driven society that is pushing the Earth toward the breaking point but only in a very superficial way.

The characters are simplistic stereotypes that are never developed beyond the obvious. You have Colonel Quaritch (the fantastic Stephen Lang), a perfect stereotype of the gung-ho military officer who only wants to blow up everything in his path without any consideration whatsoever for anything but the body count of bad guys. Lang did a great job with a one-dimensional character making him larger than life and charismatic every time he appeared on screen but yet you have to be disappointed to have such a one-dimensional antagonist. You also have your usual arrogant corporate executive (Giovani Ribisi) who is predictably asked to look sorry and disgusted when his orders to blow everything up are followed. You have the geeky and slightly douchy scientist (Joel Moore) and I could go on and on. This is not to say that Avatar’s cast did terrible, far from that. Sam Worthington gives a worthy performance as Jake Sully and he looks primed to become Hollywood’s next big action movie star. James Cameron also continued his tradition of portraying strong women with Zoe Saldana who is entirely CGI-modeled and who gave an effective performance as Neytiri and provided a believable PG-13 romance. Sigourney Weaver and the heroic Michelle Rodriguez  complete the tough-as-nail female cast.

Last but not least, the musical score by James Horner is a bit questionable since the first few notes of his main score are recycled from the one from Titanic. I had Titanic’s main theme going full blast in my head every single time I heard those first few notes in the movie. Not a good thing… While the musical score for Titanic was haunting and emotional, the one for Avatar was mostly generic and did not elevate the movie at all.

Avatar is a bit too predictable and has a fairly ordinary story-line, however it is such a technical masterpiece that it is  still one of the top movies of the year. The gorgeous creation of the world of Pandora is by itself worth the price of admission. Here is to hope James Cameron doesn’t wait 12 years to come up with another movie.

B+

Notes: PG-13 (of course… can’t make the budget back with an R-rated movie), 162 minutes. Seen in digital 3D non-IMAX theater.

Avatar_still01

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 7.8/10 (24 votes cast)

Avatar (2009): Feature Trailer

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 10.0/10 (2 votes cast)

Avatar (2009) Trailer

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)