Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Archives

LAMB #393

Large Association of Movie Blogs

1001 Movies Club

Grade Scale

  • A+: Never say never
  • A: A masterpiece
  • A-: A near-masterpiece
  • B+: Very good movie
  • B: Good movie but some minor flaws
  • B-: Pretty good but some flaws
  • C+: Slightly above average
  • C: Average
  • C-: Mediocre
  • D: Bad movie!!!
  • F: Atrocious, avoid at all cost!

Movie Review: Extract (2009)

Joel (Jason Bateman) is the successful owner of a food flavoring plant. He is about to sell the factory to General Mill for a nice chunk of money and all he needs to do is keep the company running smoothly while the transaction goes down. Unfortunately, his occasionally incompetent employees provoke an accident that causes a worker (Clifton Collins Jr.) to lose one of his testicles. Joel has to deal with the fallout of this situation while having to deal with an obnoxious neighbor (David Koechner), a frigid and potentially unfaithful wife (Kristin Wiig) and the urge of starting an affair with the intriguing new temp (Mila Kunis).

Directed by Mike Judge, Extract is an amusing comedy set in a mundane workplace much like Judge’s previous movie Office Space (1999). Instead of seeing the movie from the perspective of the employees, Extract takes the perspective of the guys upstairs. Although the movie has some forgettable moments, it also has enough cleverly hilarious patches to make a solid comedy and satire of the modern workplace. Some of the characters appear as caricatures but the movie always stays firmly grounded, honest and satirical. When her purse is stolen, Mary (Beth Grant) immediately accuses the poor Hector, a hard-working and soft-spoken Mexican even though he has done nothing wrong and she has no proof. That’s what I love about this movie, it doesn’t cater to Hollywood’s tradition of over-the-top idiotic comedy just for the sake of easy laughs. Everything flows rather naturally and the closest we ever come to cheap comedy is the hilarious pot-smoking scene.

The movie is entirely carried by the affable Jason Bateman who is, in my opinion, the best straight comedian in show business and he quietly puts together another great performance which is alone worth watching. Joe makes all kind of bad decisions such as hiring a  not-so-bright gigolo to seduce his wife, or being too much of a nice guy with his obnoxious neighbor Nathan but he has very much of a well-meaning everyman quality that makes him so easy to sympathize with and laugh at.

SNL’s wonderful Kristin Wigg is terrific as Joe’s wife and I wish she would have gotten a little more screen time to develop her character more. David Koechner gives a great tidbit performance as the incredibly talkative neighbor while Ben Affleck has some fun playing Joel’s dopey best friend. On a downside, Mila Kunis is pretty to look at, which is pretty much all she did in the movie as her character is uninteresting and flat. It would have helped if her character was more likable (as it is hinted to toward the end) but Kunis doesn’t have the ability to make this apparent.

Despite a rather unfocused script, Extract is an unpretentious and understated feel-good comedy, elevated by a very likable cast. Extract may not be the best comedy ever made but it’s an agreeable and funny ride nonetheless and it would not be surprising if it became another cult classic a few years from now.

B

Notes: Rated R for language, sexual references and some drug use. 92 minutes.

VN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 6.3/10 (6 votes cast)

Movie Review: State of Play (2009)

State of Play is a political thriller directed by Kevin Macdonald and released back in April of 2009. I initially wanted to see it in theater due to the deliriously star-studded cast but ended up not going so I was quite thrilled to get my hands on the DVD. State of Play stands in sharp contrast with the movies we have seen the last few months (or years in fact) because it’s a smart and engaging adult movie about something meaningful and current. Sadly, State of Play could be the last of a dying breed of movies about investigative journalism. Heck I don’t even know if that even exist anymore in real life…

The movie takes place in Washington D.C and starts with the murder of a petty thief and the apparent suicide of an attractive aide intimately involved with rising star congressman Stephen Collins (Ben Affleck). Russell Crowe plays Cal McAffrey, Collins’ friend and an old-school investigative reporter for the Washington Globe who tends to do his job the good old way: with a pen, a notepad and his 16-yr old computer. He is investigating the seemingly unrelated deaths and can’t help but see a big corporate conspiracy in the works. Cal is teamed with Della Frye (Rachel McAdams), a young naive and inexperienced writer who is his complete opposite. She is hip, using the latest technology, and (gasp) blogging away on the newspaper website. Their uneasy rapport evolves as he takes her under his wing, and they attempt to uncover the truth behind those murders. Let’s see: sex, politics, corporate conspiracy, corruption, current events, and a couple inquisitive journalists asking the right questions? Quite different from the mindless comic books movies, bland romantic comedies, and animation films we have seen as of late, isn’t it?

Although State of Play has an intriguing plot, it is more than anything, one of those classy political thriller meet old-school journalism reporting and how this is clashing with this recent culture of blogging and instant news gratification, which is causing the death of newspapers as we know them. This struggle between old and new journalism is represented by the apparent initial tension between Cal and Della. He is a seasoned, middle-aged, reporter who takes all the time he needs to write a story, carefully investigating every lead and getting all the facts needed to print a story. On the other hand, young hip blogger Della comes cheap, churn out stories all day long, and doesn’t necessarily care about getting all the facts straight. Cal doesn’t see Della as a real journalist and has little respect for her initially. This all changes when editor-in-chief Cameron Lynne (Helen Mirren) teams them together on the story, expecting little from Della. Cal quickly finds out that young Della is smarter and more dedicated than he expected, and realizes that no one really showed her what investigative reporting really is. He decides to take her under his wing and she rises under the challenge. The movie also gets you to feel the pressure of having to print sensational stories to sell newspapers in the current environment and the rush of having to meet a deadline.

The main issue with the movie was the ending. Don’t worry, I will not spoil anything but let’s say I was expecting something grandiose and meaningful, not some contrived conclusion after all this major conspiracy development. Worst of all is that we almost got that ending, Cal and Della were already celebrating it, drinking whiskey in paper cups in the wee-hours of the morning but … no! They had to add that questionable twist to conclude the film. Another potential issue is that the plot is very dense and thick which could leave inattentive viewers confused. Lastly, supporting characters could have been developed further but the movie runs at 123 minutes already (It was a 6-hour BBC mini-series by the way)


The movie was finely acted with very solid work from a ridiculously star-studded cast. Russell Crowe turns in a good performance as the crusty and scruffy Cal, carrying some extra weight, sporting long hairs, and displaying some of that wisecracking skills he is so good at (wish there was more). He is torn between loyalty to his friend, and the need to publish a meaningful story. while having to baby-sit a cub reporter. In supporting roles: Helen Mirren played the tumultuous and foul-mouthed editor-in-chief Cameron Lynne convincingly. Rachel McAdams is underused but captures the essence of a cub journalist in over her head, showing that Della is smart and ambitious but at the same time, clueless as a naive rookie reporter who has never done any real field investigation. Robin Wright Penn was given very little screen time but conveyed a ton of subtle elements about her character. Jason Bateman was fantastic as a cynical and slimy PR guy who panics after he realizes he knows too much, and finally it was nice to see Jeff Daniels looking sharp and menacing as the power-broking congressman. Ben Affleck was the only one turning in a less than good performance but he was still OK, a bit too young for his role as a congressman but he did not ruin it like he usually does with one of his trademark expressionless performances. Needless to say, an impressive collection of talent and the main highlight of the movie.

State of Play is a well-acted, well-directed, and smart thriller which is also meaningful and will make you ponder the future of investigative journalism in the age of blogging. Highly recommended!

B+

Notes: The credits were really cool! PG-13, 127 minutes.

VN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 8.3/10 (3 votes cast)

Movie Review: Hancock (2008)

Tired of watching the same old take on superhero movie? Then Hancock might just be for you. Hancock (Will Smith) is an alcoholic, careless superhero disliked by the general population because of his childish behavior and obvious contempt for just about everyone. Although well intentioned, Hancock causes immense amount of collateral damage, flying into buildings, wrecking public and private property carelessly. The movie starts off real promising only to leave you completely unsatisfied and thinking about all the possibilities left unturned by director Peter Berg. The movie at a brisk 98 minutes introduced a quite interesting plot twist. However, too little is known about Hancock himself or Mary (Charlize Theron) to make this movie memorable.

In terms of acting, you will get your usual superficial Will Smith which is disappointing because he is so much better than that. On the other hand, Jason Bateman was the real surprise, quirky and funny. A real eye opener on what this actor could do in the future. Charlize Theron was solid with a lightly written character.

The movie being obviously an introduction to a second movie (has to be right?) should have done a much better job of laying a foundation for the next movie. Finally, the villain (Eddie Marsan) was freaking horrible. In short, Hancock is entertaining, but too brisk, too superficial, and with too many stones left untouched…

Not much more to say for a movie that seems rushed and shallow…

C+

VN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 8.0/10 (2 votes cast)

Movie Review: Juno (2007)

Just came back from watching Juno, directed by Jason Reitman, and I have to say that I was very pleasantly surprised. The movie is quite hilarious, yet smart and witty. The movie features an excellent cast with Ellen Page, Jason Bateman, Jennifer Garner, and J.K Simmons. Pretty original turn, excellent script, brilliant casting and acting performances, and Ellen Page was outstanding as Juno. What’s best, It’s in Minnesota!!!!

A-: Definitely one of the year’s BEST movie

VN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 8.5/10 (2 votes cast)