Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Archives

LAMB #393

Large Association of Movie Blogs

1001 Movies Club

Grade Scale

  • A+: Never say never
  • A: A masterpiece
  • A-: A near-masterpiece
  • B+: Very good movie
  • B: Good movie but some minor flaws
  • B-: Pretty good but some flaws
  • C+: Slightly above average
  • C: Average
  • C-: Mediocre
  • D: Bad movie!!!
  • F: Atrocious, avoid at all cost!

Movie News: Weekly Round-Up

Movie News:

Casting News:

  • Robert DeNiro cast in Neil Burger’s The Dark Fields (Variety)
  • Hugh Jackman cast in civil rights movie Selma (USA Today)
  • Jonah Hill replaces Demetri Martin in Moneyball (The Playlist)

  • Rachel McAdams joins Owen Wilson, Marion Cottilard in Woody Allen’s next film (THR): A few weeks ago, I wrote about Owen Wilson teaming up with Red’s beloved Marion Cottilard in this Woody Allen flick and look who is joining them! First Terrence Malick’s movie a few weeks ago, now Woody Allen’s, great to see Rachel get to work with some legendary directors.
  • Benicio Del Toro cast in crime drama Making Jack Falcone (Deadline)
  • Rachel Nichols cast in Marcus Nispel’s Conan (Latino Review): Rachel Nichols was the only reason to watch GI Joe and probably the only reason to see Conan and I’m not speaking in terms of acting chops here…
  • Lenny Kravitz cast in Lee Daniels’ Selma (The Playlist)
  • Liam Hemsworth cast in Arabian Nights (Heat Vision)
  • Anna Faris cast in comedy What’s your Number? (Variety)
  • Jessica Lucas cast in Big Momma’s House 3 (Variety)

  • Liv Tyler, Patrick Wilson, Terrence Howard, Charlie Hunnam join suspense film The Ledge (THR): This sounds like a promising movie with a decent cast. Charlie Hunnam will play a suicidal man ready to jump off a building before noon while Terrence Howard will play the cop trying to convince him that life doesn’t suck!
  • Ryan Gosling join Steve Carrell in new untitled comedy by John Requa and Glenn Ficarra (Variety)
  • Viggo Mortensen joins David Cronenberg again in Talking Cure (Deadline)
  • Mike Vogel and Garrett Hedlund top candidates for Captain America, not Krasinski as reported earlier (Deadline): Does anyone actually have any idea what the hell is going on?

Trailers:

  • Zombie flick Survival of the Dead (First Showing)
  • Legend of the Guardians teaser (Yahoo)
  • The Runaways with Dakota Fanning, Kristen Stewart (Yahoo)
  • Harry Brown with Michael Caine: This is like Taken, check out the trailer! (First Showing)
  • New trailer for Iron Man 2: This almost seem too… full of excess? (Apple)
  • MUST WATCH: Tron Legacy first teaser trailer (First Showing)

Links: Is this a slow week or what?

Top 35 Acting Performances of the Decade

I haven’t posted for a few days but I was hard at work with this post! Few people have actually posted  about the top performances of the decade and the few that I saw are top 25 so I went 10 steps further for a top 35 performances of the decade. I tried to be balanced and populated the list with about as many female performances as male one. The list was initially ranked because everyone loves rankings so much but after some pondering, I had to  remove those meaningless numbers and shuffle things around. The point is those performances were some of my favorites of the decade and it wouldn’t do justice to any of them to try to put one ahead of another.

This was an incredibly difficult list to populate because there was so many notably good performances each and every year to choose from and making a small list of 35 doesn’t do justice to all the excellent work we have had the chance to watch over the years. Finally, well I haven’t seen every movies of last decade so there might be a few glaring omissions. I’m working on those! If you feel like I personally offended or infuriated you, yes it was definitely on purpose. Here are Anomalous Material top 35 performances of the decade:

Warning: Heavy in content. 56K users should not proceed.

Don’t Miss the Jump >>

Continue reading Top 35 Acting Performances of the Decade »

Sherlock Holmes (2009): OMG BFF ROFL!!

Let’s get it straight right away: Sherlock Holmes, directed by Guy Ritchie, is  quite a riot and one of the most entertaining movie of the year. To be honest, I was quite mortified when I learned that Guy Ritchie ended up at the helm of the movie. Ritchie had been misfiring badly since the awesome Snatch all the way back in 2000 after all. Here, he gives us a movie which suffers from a sloppy screenplay and overbearing editing but is action packed, gorgeous looking and quite funny.

Synopsis: Just fresh off capturing and witnessing the hanging of Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong), an occult serial killer, Sherlock Holmes (Robert Downey Jr.) and Dr. Watson (Jude Law) are stunned to hear rumors that he has resurrected back from the dead and resumed his killing spree. To complicate matters, Watson is planning to get married to pretty Mary Marstan (Kelly Reilly) and move out of good old 221b Baker Street to Holmes great despair. Holmes, hilariously resolved not to let that happen, attempts to sabotage his friend’s proposal while hunting down Lord Blackwood. Holmes perks up considerably though when his tempestuous old love interest, the fetching Irene Adler (Rachel McAdams) pops back in town for some mysterious business.

Some “purists”, who should probably re-read Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, will complain that the movie is not true to Sherlock Holmes’ essence. However, it is made clear in the written stories that he is a martial art expert and an avid boxer (“The Adventure Of The Empty House“). Why would a man who often puts himself in danger not come into some physical confrontation at one point or another and you know… use his fighting skills? Next, it is often described that Holmes tends to come alive when his mind is kept busy with enigmas but he tends toward depression when his mind idles. Watson is his closest friend so it would not be so far fetched for Holmes to disapprove of Watson’s impending marriage for his own well-being. Guy Ritchie only attempts to break the old preconceptions of the characters while staying faithful to the material, which is actually highly open for interpretation. People have this preconceived image of this stern detective in a deerstalker hat, smoking a pipe, and saying “Elementary, my dear Watson” (which he never does in the novels by the way). I’m glad Ritchie gave a modern face-lift to the character because the original work itself is extremely conducive to a successful movie franchise and would bring a new generation of people to get interested in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s work.

Many things are already assumed as the movie begins, keeping Ritchie from having to  go through a laborious introduction of every single aspects of  Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s work. The best thing going for Sherlock Holmes is the lively homo-erotic relationship between the eccentric Holmes and the proper Watson. The two have been best of friends and been cohabiting for the longest of time. Hence, the upcoming proposal by Watson to Mary Marstan throws a big wrench into that idyllic picture in Holmes’ mind. The casting of the lead roles was simply perfect. It was daring for Guy Ritchie to cast an American actor to play a quintessential British figure and the charismatic Robert Downey Jr doesn’t disappoint: An articulate and quick-witted performer, he is one of the few actors who can play an eccentric genius convincingly. His Sherlock Holmes is unkempt, arrogant, socially awkward and has his vulnerabilities especially his feelings toward Watson and Irene. Holmes is also street-wise, larger than life, and a genius badass altogether. Jude Law gives a strong performance, holding his own opposite Downey. Without Watson, there is no Sherlock Holmes and this describes their relationship in the movie as well. Watson is  not pictured here as some inferior acolyte like in most previous interpretations. He is a smart and tough cookie, an Afghan war veteran who knows how to take care of himself. Downey and Law obviously had great fun shooting the movie and it shows. Together, they have excellent chemistry and absolutely nail the hilarious and constant cat fights they have over anything and everything.

The near-total focus on Holmes and Watson hurts the supporting cast who tends to get lost in Ritchie’s frenzied excess. Nevertheless, the always reliable Eddie Marsan is perfectly cast as Scotland Yard’s hapless inspector Lestrade. Lestrade is rigid and does everything by the book which puts him at odds with Holmes unconventional methods. Lord Blackwood presents an intriguing case because of the arcane and supernatural aura of his character which challenges Holmes’ rigorously scientific mind. British actor Mark Strong showcases another solid job as the character in a role that could easily have been one dimensional. Strong has a deep booming voice which makes him ideal for bad guy’s role and it helps him here to turn his thinly written character into a somewhat worthy adversary.

The first victims in action movies, when it comes to cutting scenes, are usually the women and Guy Ritchie does the ladies no favors with terribly underdeveloped roles for the Irene Adler and Mary Marstan characters. Their story line could have been more compelling if they didn’t disappear for large chunks of the movie at a time. In the stories, it is made clear that Holmes has no interest or respect whatsoever for women except for his weird admiration for Irene Adler, the only woman to ever outwit him fair and square (“A Scandal in Bohemia“). She is here reinvented as an American adventuress with a personal agenda who randomly pops in and out of the movie and it is obvious from the trailer that several of her scenes were left on the cutting room floor to keep the movie at a reasonable duration. Her motives are kept mysterious throughout the movie but it is implied she is being used by some powerful man (guess who?) who is obviously the real bad guy. Aside from looking delicious, poor Rachel McAdams is completely wasted in a thankless supporting role but finds the resource to rise above her lady-in-distress part. She blends her femininity with guile, feisty mischief, and some affecting vulnerability but ultimately isn’t given much of anything to do!!! (Yes, I want to smash my screen with the keyboard). This may be a trick to expand on her character organically in the sequel but it’s not a good one at all!!!! In the meanwhile, the lovely Kelly Reilly is just as underused and given little to work with. Thankfully, she manages to give a spirited turn as Watson’s love interest in a nondescript role.

It’s true that Guy Ritchie has always been more about style than substance and this doesn’t change here as the movie starts with an eye-opening action sequence. Ritchie and his writers, however, were patient and smart enough to stay true to the original material. Sherlock Holmes’ fans will notice the numerous nods to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s material such as Holmes’ prized picture of Irene he stole in “A Scandal in Bohemia” or the references to Holmes’ defining traits and past experiences. The action unravels at a frenzied pace and are a nearly unrelenting mix of action and chase sequences. Much like in Snatch, the action scene progressively ramp up and when you think that you can’t possibly go higher, Ritchie tops it off with an even more extravagant sequence. In terms of solving the mysteries, Ritchie also avoids the laborious dialogues that have become so cliche and uses nifty visual flashbacks instead to great effect. At the end of the day though, it is the lively banter between Downey, Law and McAdams that keeps Sherlock Holmes together and the movie tends to slow down dramatically when Holmes is by himself.

The intermittently sagging and overlong screenplay, written by an army of scribes (ok, more like 4), doesn’t take anything seriously which makes it tough for the viewer to believe that the main characters are ever in serious harm’s way. The plot is easily the weakest part of the movie and felt overly intricate and yet too simplistic for a Sherlock Holmes story. You know what? It’s all right if everyone has no idea what’s going on as long as it unravels neatly because it’s the same way with the written stories. Please don’t dumb it down to the level of a 4th grader. On a good note, the screenwriter did a nice job of setting up the next movie by leaving some parts of the plot open-ended. The movie has a feel reminiscent of Batman Begins in that it’s only a stepping stone to establish the main trio, a couple side characters and the world they live in.

Wait a minute…

The weakness in the plot are somewhat compensated thanks to award-worthy production values. The movie was shot in and around London and its Victorian recreation has a brilliant Gothic feel with the city shown as a slimy, filthy, and murky place. The action sequences are well shot and the climactic scene above the Thames River is a highlight. The costumes and period sets are so painstakingly detailed that they merit a mention. Sherlock Holmes’ costumes are rumpled and bohemian looking to emphasize his lack of personal care. On the other hand, Watson’s clothes are neat and very proper to reflect his military background and his discipline. Irene’s dresses and suits are particularly colorful and detailed to highlight a woman ahead of her time, living on the edge of the law and straddling the line between love and distrust in her relationship with Holmes. The sets were carefully built and if you only take your eyes out of the action for a minute, you will notice the incredible details in the background which contribute to create a breathing, living world. On a final note, the musical score by Hans Zimmer is original, ostentatious, strangely memorable and completes the action on the screen well. I would almost call it a work of genius.

Despite significant screenplay flaws, Sherlock Holmes is a fluffy but entertaining action-oriented interpretation of the beloved characters which will please its targeted 15-30 male-based audience. Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law form one of the most entertaining action duo in recent memory and give the audience a nice Christmas gift. Has a new franchise begun? Elementary, my dear Watson!

B+

Notes: PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and action, some startling images and a scene of suggestive material. 128 minutes.

Related Links: Sherlock Holmes Basics (Yes, I thought of you)

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 8.2/10 (10 votes cast)

Sherlock Holmes Box Office Poll

I was discussing box office prospects for Avatar and Sherlock Holmes earlier with a friend and he said he didn’t expect Sherlock Holmes to do well at the box office. Given the fact that it has the hugely popular Robert Downey Jr, that the movie is receiving fairly favorable early reviews, and is more of a bankable action/adventure movie, I was quite surprised. What do you expect Sherlock Holmes total US box office will be? (Budget was rumored to be about $80 mil)

How well will Sherlock Holmes do at the US Box Office?

  • Smash Hit > $130 mil (38%, 3 Votes)
  • Decent Hit $80-130 mil (50%, 4 Votes)
  • Mild Bust $50-80 mil (13%, 1 Votes)
  • Huge Bust < $50 mil (-1%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 8

Loading ... Loading ...

Movie Review: Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005)

kkbbDirected by Shane Black, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is a 2005 dark comedy that was completely overlooked in the US, barely grossing $4.2M at the US box office, despite mostly favorable critical acclaim.

Harry Lockhart (Robert Downey Jr.) is a petty thief who is mistaken for an actor while burglarizing some store in an hilarious beginning to the movie. He is sent to Los Angeles where he meets Gay Perry (Val Kilmer), a gay private detective (ah ah how clever) with whom he is supposed to get detective lessons for a role, and Harmony Lane (Michelle Monaghan), a struggling actress. Harry immediately falls for Harmony who he later recognizes as his high school crush. Everything gets awry when Harry gets entangled in some odd murder mystery while shadowing Perry. The three team up to solve the mysterious deaths and more hilarity ensues.

The structure of the movie is refreshing with Downey narrating the movie at various point in time. The movie sometimes pauses or jumps backward in time to let the narration enlighten the audience. There is a good amount of satire and mocking of numerous aspects of Hollywood and movie making that keep the film entertaining throughout. More than anything however, the movie is about story telling (hint: literally, watch the ending, I won’t say more).

Robert Downey Jr. is… Robert Downey Jr, in a good way. You know the quirky, fast-talking, super-smart guy we are used to. Only this time, he is not super-smart and a simple mathematical calculations toward the end of the movie goes hilariously wrong! This was a role that very few Hollywood actors could have successfully taken and Downey was perfect for it. However, Val Kilmer was the revelation of the movie. I haven’t seen him in so long. I never thought he could be that funny and show great nuance between being both a tough and queer guy! Both have great on-screen chemistry and are hilarious together. Michelle Monaghan is solid as the attractive yet down-to-Earth girl next door gone a bit wrong.

Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is an hilarious and smartass dark comedy slash thriller that doesn’t take itself too seriously. Robert Downey Jr. was perfect in another role made only for him and the endless pop culture reference keep the movie entertaining all the way to the credits. At the end of the day though, the movie has a complex plot that is much about nothing.

B+

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)

Fall/Winter 2009 Movie Preview

I’m a little late for Fall since it’s already mid-October but let’s take a look at the top 10 movies coming the next few weeks that look the most intriguing after a fairly decent summer crop. It’s getting colder, darker, wetter and money is in short supply unless you are a bank executive. Which movies are worth seeing ahead of Award season?

Continue reading Fall/Winter 2009 Movie Preview »

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Movie Review: Ironman (2008)

Just came back from Iron Man, by far the best Marvel comics movie up to this point (yea except for Spiderman 2, it’s really not that hard to do). I could give you the whole story again but you can read that in any review right? Robert Downey Jr. has always been an extremely talented actor but now mainstream audience know about it as he was sensational as the Iron Man. Solid cast overall although Terrence Howard and his somewhat high pitched voice doesn’t make him very believable as a high echelon military officer. Nevermind, he was an Air Force officer, it does make sense after all ;) Gwyneth Paltrow was fine albeit unmemorable as Pepper Potts although I still don’t understand how she survived the explosion in the lab at the end of the movie. The focus is obviously on Iron man but it would have added to the movie to make the Pepper Potts role a little more significant than that shallow little role.

Nevertheless, the movie kind of made me want to know how to put shit together and have a sweet lab in the basement where you can experience with that stuff. Nevermind no, this made me think about freshman Physics I and II. Never again… Simplistic plot but fast paced, excellent cinematography, and no abuse of CGI effects (cough *I am Legend COUGH).

Also there is a scene at the end of the credits but I can tell you now: It’s not worth the wait. If the credits was a roll of paper, it would probably stretch across the United States and then back. Everyone from the food caterers to the assistant to the assistant of Mrs. Paltrow were in the credits uh… umm back to topic. Respect to those people, they made this and all over motion pictures possible. In any case, very entertaining and memorable movie!

A-

Also saw Harold and Kumar escape from Guantanamo Bay right after Iron Man. Same old pony trick but it had a few really hilarious scenes that left me gasping for air. Notably the one where Harold and Kumar are hiding in the dark basement of some rednecks while their in-bred child with one eye is lurking around in the dark as well as the sex scene with Kumar, Vanessa (the gorgeous Danneel Harris), and that good old giant bag of weed. A lot of nudity and sexually explicit scene so don’t bring your mom with you. Not as good as the first one, not worth the money, I would rent it on DVD for a quick laugh but that’s it.

D-

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Don't forget to vote! What did YOU think about the movie?
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)